?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
18 May 2007 @ 04:37 pm
Discovering "Smarm"  
Not the obsequious kind, either.

Yesterday, wandering through metafandom, I happened on a discussion of "smarm" fic. thelana is probably laughing her butt off right about now...


So, "smarm" is what one really might consider sexless slash. Proponents don't see it that way, and it doesn't always cross that line, but sometimes the manLove is more than brotherly, you know?

What thelana's going to laugh about is that I have unwittingly written "smarm" on occasion. Sometimes I still think of it as Gen (the manLove is typically brief and doesn't go on and on), and other times it's supposed to be Slash but doesn't get as far as I'd intended (in which case, I really consider it "light Slash").

A very thorough definition/argument of what constitutes "smarm" can be found here. The audience for it is readers who want big manLove and affection and often touching and cuddling, but no sex. Slash lovers may wonder what the point of that is, but I clearly remember that my first Slashy desires were around age 13/14, and I would have been perfectly happy to fade out with romantic kissing and snuggling together in bed. Obviously, I've expanded my horizons since then, but you get my point. The thing is, though, that's still Slash to me.

So, case in point there is this Sentinel story, Beach by two very big fans of smarm, and for me that is definitely slash. Check out this chapter here, where there is kissing, tonguing, and I believe also declarations of love.

Looking at the larger story (I wasted some 3 hours at work reading this thing, and hating myself afterwards), if you look past the buckets of crying in the story it is a big hurt/comfort-fest of touching, cuddling, kissing, hair-petting, declared love, romanticizing of the other person, pondering on "joined souls" and "owning each others' hearts". There are also some 11 installments of naked showering, and some 6+ of naked bed-cuddling before it wanders off into a dream sequence (still a WIP).

See, now, that is clearly romantic love to me-- it might be brotherly love if they were actual brothers (though if there's tonguing, I think some misunderstandings are going to arise!), but how is that NOT light Slash? The fact that there's no mention of arousal when they're mooshing their groins up against each other? (Seriously. And as the rest of the story is written, if you're that emotionally thrilled by someone I don't see a physical reaction not happening, especially for men).

So, I read some more in that genre last night (could not help myself-- and I never even watched the Sentinel!). Some of it is just a hug, a touch here and there. But there are loads of what can only be called cuddling, honestly.

I don't know. I can definitely see why there would be an audience for stories that cut off at the pre-sexual point, but most of what I read I'd still say is Slash or Slashy.

And that particular story, 70+ installments and not yet finished... I have to call that emo-Porn, because it totally is. Not a bad thing, but that definitely describes it.

Clarification: I totally forgot about the range of canon behavior. I.e., if we're talking "Starsky and Hutch" even a single kiss on the mouth might just be Gen smarm, depending on how romantically skewed that was. Virtually everthing else was already canon. NOT that I have any complaints about that...

What do all of you think? Probably many of you were already aware of it long before me!

So, thanks to the time wasted on the story in the cut zone above, I never did get out to exercise yesterday. :( Which means that today, I had legs and then some! In other words:

Cycling: 34 miles for speed today! Whoo! Plus a couple more to warm down. I did nearly get hit by a van, making a U-turn right into the bike lane where I was progressing, and she stopped right in front of me. I was pissed. I smacked one of her back windows with my fist and came around to discuss this with her, but she was already stumbling through an apology and was honestly so horrified with herself that I relented, and thanked her for apologizing. Yikes!

No interesting animals today-- not even the pygmy goats were out! Earlier this week, along this same route (the office, not the bike path), I caused a mini cattle-stampede. \o/ On the plus side, the roadkill count is still down.

Got a drabble to post this weekend for bluesister, if I can force it to be 100 words and not keep creeping up. Almost there...



Tags:
 
 
 
Rat Creature: readingratcreature on May 21st, 2007 02:51 am (UTC)
Re: here via metafandom
See, I want stories comprehensively labelled too in order not to waste my time. I want to know the characters, and the genre, and if it is a pwp I want to know the pairing and the kink, and especially I want a decent summary blurb rather than some random bizarre half-line of dialog for a summary. What I'm saying is that for me the gen/slash/het thing isn't the be -all of labelling.

Say there is a story in an ensemble show like SGA with the whole team, Sheppard and McKay are currently a couple but it isn't really a romance focus, during a pause in the action adventure plot, they camp at night off world there's some talk about previous relationships and Ronon mentions his dead fiancee while there's some UST between him and Teyla but nothing happens yet, also he tells an embarrassing story how he and Sheppard had to jerk each other off for a fertility ritual on a previous mission, but mostly it's the team sitting and talking doing team things. Now if you follow the gen, slash het division plus pairing plus summary you may end up with "Slash, het. Pairings: Sheppard/McKay, Sheppard/Ronon, Ronon/other, Teyla/Ronon." how does *that* represent the story better than labelling it "team action-adventure, characters: Sheppard, McKay, Teyla, Ronon"? With the first you think it's an orgy.

Sure for romance and porn the pairings are the most important thing, for other stories that just also have relationships in them,just listing the pairings doesn't tell you much of value.
The Coalition For Disturbing Metaphors: Venushalfshellvenus on May 21st, 2007 03:02 am (UTC)
Re: here via metafandom
What I'm saying is that for me the gen/slash/het thing isn't the be -all of labelling.

Ah, I have a better idea of what you're getting at.

You're saying the genre is not the most important part for you-- you'd rather have some idea of the "flavor" of the story, i.e., the "mood" genre as well as the characters/overall genre (i.e., is it drama? Or angst? Is it humor? Or crack? Is it drama and humor both? Is it PWP?)

I actually think pretty much everyone wants all of those things too (nothing like a summary that implies Drama and is actually Crack, for instance). That is, everyone except the people who complain about ridiculously long headers-- but that's usually about the "Oscar-award-winner speech" style of author's notes, and not the summary. :0

Now if you follow the gen, slash het division plus pairing plus summary you may end up with "Slash, het. Pairings: Sheppard/McKay, Sheppard/Ronon, Ronon/other, Teyla/Ronon." how does *that* represent the story better than labelling it "team action-adventure, characters: Sheppard, McKay, Teyla, Ronon"?
I'd probably go with what you have, and add in "mentions of non-shippy slash"-- the jerking-off thing is the most likely to wig people out. Unless it's just mentioned and not actually described, in which case-- leave it off.
Rat Creature: talkratcreature on May 21st, 2007 03:34 am (UTC)
Re: here via metafandom
Of course comprehensive headers with more information are better (disregarding for the moment the whole issue of spoilery warnings and labels, there are after all even romance stories where the tension comes from not knowing whom the character will end up with). What annoys me about the gen/slash/het trinity is its prominence in fannish labelling that assumes this as the single most important categorization, pushing other sometimes far more useful labels aside in the way things are organized etc. also regardless of that these divisions don't ebven make sense for some stories.

When something is labelled smarm *that label already tells the reader to expect an intense, intimate relationship between the two main characters usually with physical contact and affection. That in itself is as useful and and actually more narrow than "gen" or "slash". So why insist on a gen or slash label, when you don't insist that an author absolutely has to declare whether something is a comedy or a tragedy or whatever and *those* labels are all optional?

For example I never felt a lack of labelling or descriptions on saffronhouse's page, there's a section for gen stories with the smarm like "Beach" marked smarm on that page for gen readers not into smarm, and the slash is on an extra page.
Helen W.wneleh on May 21st, 2007 09:51 am (UTC)
Re: here via metafandom
My first thought was, I'd label the story "Team action/adventure, McShep, various adult relationships mentioned and implied."

I'd be explicit about McShep because, in SGA, that seems to be something people want to know.

But if the story has that particular conversation, I'd think there was some overall theme of, I-don't-know, SOMETHING that would bring that up?

- - - -

My issues with the gen/slash/het labeling are similar to yours, though.

- Helen